HOME    SEARCH    ABOUT US    CONTACT US    HELP   
           
Montana Administrative Register Notice 17-360 No. 12   06/26/2014    
Prev Next

 

BEFORE THE BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

OF THE STATE OF MONTANA

 

In the matter of the amendment of ARM 17.8.501 and 17.8.504 pertaining to definitions and air quality permit application fees

)

)

)

)

NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON PROPOSED AMENDMENT

 

(AIR QUALITY)

 

            TO: All Concerned Persons

 

            1. On July 16, 2014, at 1:00 p.m., the Board of Environmental Review will hold a public hearing in Room 111, Metcalf Building, 1520 East Sixth Avenue, Helena, Montana, to consider the proposed amendment of the above-stated rules.

 

            2. The board will make reasonable accommodations for persons with disabilities who wish to participate in this public hearing or need an alternative accessible format of this notice. If you require an accommodation, contact Elois Johnson, Paralegal, no later than 5:00 p.m., July 7, 2014, to advise us of the nature of the accommodation that you need. Please contact Elois Johnson at Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 200901, Helena, Montana 59620-0901; phone (406) 444-2630; fax (406) 444-4386; or e-mail ejohnson@mt.gov.

 

            3. The rules proposed to be amended provide as follows, stricken matter interlined, new matter underlined:

 

            17.8.501 DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this subchapter, the following definitions apply:

            (1) remains the same.

            (2) "Major modification" has the same meaning as in ARM 17.8.801.

            (2) (3)  "Modified source facility" means a facility for which an application to modify, as defined in ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 7 17.8.740, is submitted to the department.

            (3) (4)  "New source facility" means a source, as defined in ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 1, facility for which the department has not previously issued a Montana air quality permit.

            (5) "New major stationary source" means a major stationary source, as defined in ARM 17.8.801, for which the department has not previously issued a Montana air quality permit.

            (4) and (5) remain the same, but are renumbered (6) and (7).

            (6) "Source type A" means a facility subject to the provisions of ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 12.

            (7) "Source type B" means a facility subject to the provisions of ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 7.

            (8) "Source type NSR/PSD" means a facility subject to the provisions of ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapters 8, 9, or 10.

            (9) "Source type S/SM" means a facility subject to the provisions of ARM 17.8.1204(3).

            AUTH: 75-2-111, MCA

            IMP:  75-2-211, MCA

 

            REASON: The board is proposing to amend definitions in (2) and (3), renumber them to (3) and (4), and add two definitions as (2) and (5). The board is also proposing to eliminate definitions in (6) through (9).  The proposed amendments to (2) and (3) would replace "source" with "facility," which would make the use of those terms consistent throughout the ARM. The proposed new definitions in (2) and (5) would add definitions of "major modification" and "new major stationary source" because those terms would be used in ARM 17.8.504 to define classes of sources for purposes of establishing fees. Those terms are already defined in ARM 17.8.801 and the proposed additions would refer to that rule. The definitions in (6) through (9) are proposed to be eliminated because the proposed amendments to ARM 17.8.504 would eliminate the defined terms from the ARM. Because terms that are not used should not be defined, the board is also proposing to eliminate the definitions in (6) through (9).

 

            17.8.504 AIR QUALITY PERMIT APPLICATION FEES (1) An applicant submitting a Montana air quality permit application, as required in ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapters 7, 8, 9, or 10, shall submit an the appropriate application fee as provided in (1)(a), (b), and (c) follows:

            (a) the following table sets forth source types and associated fees:

 

Source Type

New Source

Modified Source

NSR/PSD

$15,000

$500

A

$1,200

$500

S/SM

$1,000

$500

B

$800

$500

 

            (b) $500 for an application for a portable facility; and

            (c) $500 for an application to register an oil and gas well facility.

            (a) for a facility subject to ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapters 7 and 8, 9, or 10:

            (i) for a new major stationary source - $15,000;

            (ii) for a major modification - $3,500;

            (b) for a facility subject to ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 7, and not subject to subchapters 8, 9, or 10, that is:

            (i) required by ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 12 to obtain an operating permit:

            (A) for a new facility - $2,000;

            (B) for a modified facility - $1,500;

            (ii) a new facility that is requesting an exemption under ARM 17.8.1204(3) - $1,000; or

            (iii) a modified facility that has received or is requesting an exemption under ARM 17.8.1204(3) - $500;

            (c) for a facility subject solely to ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 7:

            (i) for a new facility - $800;

            (ii) for a modified facility - $500;

            (iii) for a portable facility - $500.

            (2) An applicant submitting one or more of the following an air quality operating permit applications, as required in ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 12, shall submit an appropriate application fee, of $500 for each application as follows:

            (a) an application for a new air quality operating permit - $6,500;

            (b) an application for an air quality operating permit renewal - $2,000; or

            (c) an application for a significant modification to of an air quality operating permit - $1,500.

            (3) An air quality permit application is incomplete until the proper appropriate application fee is paid to the department.

            (4) and (5) remain the same.

 

            AUTH: 75-2-111, 75-2-220, 75-2-234, MCA

            IMP:  75-2-211, 75-2-220, 75-2-234, MCA

 

            REASON: The board is proposing to amend (1) through (2)(c). In existing (1)(a), a table uses abbreviations of source categories to set application fees. The abbreviations are defined in ARM 17.8.501(6) through (9). The board is proposing to eliminate those definitions and also the table in ARM 17.8.504 that uses those abbreviations. The sources would instead be categorized for fee purposes by the rule subchapter(s) under which the source is regulated. For example, the abbreviation "NSR/PSD" is defined in existing ARM 17.8.501(8) as "a facility subject to the provisions of ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapters 8, 9, or 10." Then, existing ARM 17.8.504(1)(a) uses the term "NSR/PSD" to set the fee for that category. A proposed amendment in ARM 17.8.504(1)(a) would substitute the phrase "a facility subject to ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapters 7 and 8, 9, or 10" for "NSR/PSD." Similar amendments are proposed for the other categories used in existing ARM 17.8.504(1)(a) to set fees. This is being proposed to make the rule simpler and clearer. The board believes that the abbreviated terms were not easy to understand without reference to the definitions rule and that the proposed amendments would make the rule easier for the public and a regulated facility to understand.

In addition, in (1)(a), the board is proposing to amend the language that establishes fees for permits for new major stationary sources and major modifications by incorporating the definitions of those terms from ARM 17.8.801, which contains definitions used in ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapter 8 to regulate Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting in "attainment" areas, where certain contaminants do not exceed national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). The PSD program is one part of the New Source Review (NSR) program, which also includes permitting in ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapters 9 and 10, for major stationary sources or major modifications in areas where the NAAQS are exceeded ("nonattainment areas") or areas with sources that may contribute to exceedances in a nonattainment area. The incorporation of definitions from ARM 17.8.801 is necessary because those terms are already defined in that rule and the terms in the fee rule must be consistent with the definitions and use of those terms in the regulatory rules in ARM Title 17, chapter 8, subchapters 8, 9, and 10.

The proposed amendments would also increase certain application fees for Montana air quality permits (MAQPs) for facilities that require major New Source Review (NSR) permits or Montana air quality operating permits (Title V). Specifically, the board is proposing the following permit application fee amendments:

            ARM 17.8.504(1)(a)(ii) - MAQP for an NSR major modification from $500 to $3,500

            ARM 17.8.504(1)(b)(i)(A) - MAQP for a New Title V facility from $1,200 to $2,000

            ARM 17.8.504(1)(b)(i)(B) - MAQP for a Modified Title V facility from $500 to $1,500

            ARM 17.8.504(2)(a) - New Title V operating permit from $500 to $6,500

            ARM 17.8.504(2)(b) - Title V operating permit renewal from $500 to $2,000

            ARM 17.8.504(2)(c) - Title V operating permit modification from $500 to $1,500

 

            The board is required by statute to "adopt a schedule of fees required for permits, permit applications, and registrations … ."  Section 75-2-111(5), MCA.  While the board is responsible for adopting the fee schedule, an air permit applicant has the responsibility to "submit to the department a fee sufficient to cover the reasonable costs, direct and indirect, of developing and administering the permitting requirements" of the air quality laws and rules.  Section 75-2-220, MCA.  Currently, permit applicants subject to the requirements of the department's Title V and NSR Montana air quality permit programs pay permit application fees that do not cover the costs incurred by the department in processing these permit applications. These costs are funded instead by the annual operating fees paid by existing businesses. This creates a situation where existing businesses are subsidizing new businesses.  The board is proposing to reduce that subsidy by increasing the application fees for: (a) a facility subject to NSR major modification; (b) a new or modified MAQP for a facility subject to Title V operating permits; and (c) a new Title V operating permit, renewal, or modification.

            The proposed levels of fee increases were developed in consultation with stakeholders. Those levels do not totally eliminate the subsidy, but will reduce it by a substantial amount.

            In an effort to determine potential monetary impacts on facilities subject to the proposed application fee amendments, the board averaged the number of potentially affected applications received by the department per year over calendar years 2009-2013, which represents the most recent five-year period for which data is available. The following table shows the cumulative increase in air quality permit application fees for the average year within that period: 

Application Type

Rule (all in ARM Title 17, chapter 8)

Average Number of Applications/Year

Average Increase From Proposed Rule/Year

MAQP (Montana Air Quality Permit)

 

 

 

NSR Major Modification

subchapters 7 and 8, 9, or 10

0.2

$600.00

New MAQP for a Facility Requiring an Operating Permit

subchapters 7 and 12

8.2

$6,560.00

MAQP Modification for a Facility Requiring an Operating Permit

subchapters 7 and 12

1.2

$1,200.00

TOTAL

 

 

$8,360.00

Operating (Title V) Permit

 

 

 

New

subchapter 12

1

$6,000.00

Renewal

subchapter 12

12

$18,000.00

Modification

subchapter 12

10

$10,000.00

TOTAL

 

 

$34,000.00

 

           

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            4. Concerned persons may submit their data, views, or arguments, either orally or in writing, at the hearing. Written data, views, or arguments may also be submitted to Elois Johnson, Paralegal, Department of Environmental Quality, 1520 E. Sixth Avenue, P.O. Box 200901, Helena, Montana 59620-0901; faxed to (406) 444-4386; or e-mailed to ejohnson@mt.gov, no later than 5:00 p.m., July 24, 2014. To be guaranteed consideration, mailed comments must be postmarked on or before that date.

 

            5. Ben Reed, attorney for the board, or another attorney for the Agency Legal Services Bureau, has been designated to preside over and conduct the hearing.

 

            6. The board maintains a list of interested persons who wish to receive notices of rulemaking actions proposed by this agency. Persons who wish to have their name added to the list shall make a written request that includes the name, e-mail, and mailing address of the person to receive notices and specifies that the person wishes to receive notices regarding: air quality; hazardous waste/waste oil; asbestos control; water/wastewater treatment plant operator certification; solid waste; junk vehicles; infectious waste; public water supply; public sewage systems regulation; hard rock (metal) mine reclamation; major facility siting; opencut mine reclamation; strip mine reclamation; subdivisions; renewable energy grants/loans; wastewater treatment or safe drinking water revolving grants and loans; water quality; CECRA; underground/above ground storage tanks; MEPA; or general procedural rules other than MEPA. Notices will be sent by e-mail unless a mailing preference is noted in the request. Such written request may be mailed or delivered to Elois Johnson, Paralegal, Department of Environmental Quality, 1520 E. Sixth Ave., P.O. Box 200901, Helena, Montana 59620-0901, faxed to the office at (406) 444-4386, e-mailed to Elois Johnson at ejohnson@mt.gov, or may be made by completing a request form at any rules hearing held by the board.

 

            7. The bill sponsor contact requirements of 2-4-302, MCA, do not apply.

 

            8. With regard to the requirements of 2-4-111, MCA, the board has determined that the amendment of the above-referenced rules will not

significantly and directly impact small businesses.

 

Reviewed by:                                                BOARD OF ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW

 

 

 

/s/ John F. North                                  BY: /s/ Robin Shropshire                                   

JOHN F. NORTH                                         ROBIN SHROPSHIRE

Rule Reviewer                                             Chairman

 

            Certified to the Secretary of State, June 16, 2014.

 

Home  |   Search  |   About Us  |   Contact Us  |   Help  |   Disclaimer  |   Privacy & Security